Galatians 1:8 versus the angel Moroni

Contested

LDS scholars have a real answer here. Say so before your friend does.

The two verses Christians reach for

Galatians 1:8 — "though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you… let him be accursed" — applied to the angel Moroni. And Revelation 22:18, warning against adding to the book.

Be careful with the second one

Revelation 22:18 says "the words of the prophecy of this book." That means Revelation itself. It is a standard closing curse for one ancient scroll.

Revelation was not even the last book of the New Testament written. Using it to shut the whole Bible is bad reading, and your friend will say so.

Where the first verse does work

Galatians 1:8 is different. It does not say an angel cannot appear.

It grants the possibility and removes its authority: the message is tested by the gospel already delivered. And Paul includes himself — though we — which makes it a test rather than a weapon.

How strong is this argument?

Arguable both ways. The canon half fails.

The Galatians half holds — and it holds against us too.

What to say

"I'd have to reject an angel with a new gospel too. Paul puts himself under that rule."

Codex Vaticanus, a fourth-century Bible; the canon settled by usage rather than by a closing decree

Codex Bezae, whose text of Acts differs widely, showing the debate concerned wording as well as books

Rembrandt's imagined Paul; Galatians 1:8 curses even an angel preaching another gospel

How they answer this — at its strongest

The closing curse seals one scroll only, and the Galatians point assumes what it must prove.

Three replies, and the first two are strong. Revelation 22:18 warns against tampering with 'the words of the prophecy of this book'. That means Revelation itself. It was a standard closing curse on a single ancient scroll. Revelation was not even the last book written. And the same logic applied to Deuteronomy 4:2 would cancel everything after Deuteronomy. Many evangelical scholars agree.

Second, the warning is about men adding to scripture. It is not about God speaking again.

Third, Galatians 1:8 condemns a different gospel. Latter-day Saints hold that the Book of Mormon teaches the same Christ crucified. On their reading the argument assumes what it is trying to prove.

The verdict

Drop the canon half; the Galatians half holds, and it tests us too.

The Revelation 22:18 version is the weakest form of this argument. Christians should stop using it. Most textual scholars agree the curse is scoped to Revelation, and the Deuteronomy comparison lands.

The Galatians 1:8 form survives that reply. But it settles nothing on its own. It turns on whether the gospel content actually matches. That sends you to the doctrinal cases, on grace and on exaltation.

Not a standalone argument. Not answered either.

Open this case in the full study tool →