Which Gospel?Islam

A 'Samaritan' at the golden calf, centuries early

Contested

Muslim scholars have a real answer here. Say so before your friend does.

What the Quran says

Quran 20:85-97 says the golden calf at Sinai was made by al-Samiri. The word means the Samaritan.

Exodus 32 says Aaron made it. So two things differ.

Who made the calf, and what he is called.

Why the name is a problem

The Samaritans came from the region of Samaria. That region was named long after the Exodus.

Its people were resettled after the Assyrian conquest in 722 BC. That is about seven centuries too late.

Scholars think the story reflects later feeling against Samaritans, who were linked with calf-worship at Bethel and Dan.

The Muslim answer, at full strength

Islamic Awareness gives a serious reply. Al-Samiri names one man.

It need not be an ethnic word at all. It could come from a clan or a place.

1 Kings 16:24 shows Shemer as a man's name, older than the city. Samaritans also claim older roots than critics allow.

And the Quran, they say, clears a prophet of making an idol.

How strong is this argument?

Genuinely arguable. Neither side can prove the name.

But the escape works against the plainest Arabic reading, where the word is the ethnic one. The critic's reading is the more likely one.

What is left either way

Exodus 32 names Aaron. The Quran moves the blame.

That difference stands whatever the name means. Nobody has answered it.

What to say

"Exodus 32 names Aaron. Have you ever read that chapter for yourself?"

Samaritans on Mount Gerizim — the people whose name appears in the golden-calf account
Samaritans on Mount Gerizim — the people whose name appears in the golden-calf account
Tintoretto's Worship of the Golden Calf, a sixteenth-century painting of the Exodus 32 episode
Tintoretto's Worship of the Golden Calf, a sixteenth-century painting of the Exodus 32 episode
Poussin's Adoration of the Golden Calf, 1633 — Exodus 32 credits the calf to Aaron
Poussin's Adoration of the Golden Calf, 1633 — Exodus 32 credits the calf to Aaron

How they answer this — at its strongest

They say al-Samiri names one man, and need not be an ethnic word.

Islamic Awareness argues that al-Samiri is a by-name for one man. It need not mean the Samaritan at all. It could come from a clan or a place name. 1 Kings 16:24 shows Shemer as a personal name, older than the city of Samaria.

There is a second route as well. Samaritan tradition itself claims roots before the exile, so the name may point to something older than critics allow. And the Quran corrects the biblical account rather than copying it, by clearing a prophet, Aaron, of making an idol.

The verdict

Arguable on the name, but the shift of blame from Aaron still stands.

The escape by word-origin is possible. Al-Samiri need not be the name of a people. And Shemer as a name is attested early.

But it pleads a special case against the plainest Arabic reading. There the word is the ethnic one, just as classical usage renders it. The story also fits known later themes of attack on Samaritans.

Neither side can strictly prove who is meant. The critic's reading is the more likely one. And clearing Aaron, against Exodus 32, is a second gap. It stands unanswered.

Open this case in the full study tool →

Sources

Related cases

Mary given Miriam's family, 1,400 years apartAlexander the Great, retold as Dhul-Qarnayn