Which Gospel?The Messiah Case

Bible codes work just as well on Moby-Dick

Don't use

This Christian argument does not hold up. Drop it.

What these are

Gematria gives Hebrew letters number values and adds them up. Bible codes claim that skipping letters at fixed intervals spells out hidden messages.

Both get used in Christian outreach as if they were evidence.

Why they fail

Researchers ran the same methods on Moby-Dick and War and Peace. They produced equally striking "predictions," including assassinations.

Any long book will do this, because the method finds patterns instead of testing them.

What it signals

Using them tells a thoughtful person that you cannot tell a pattern from a proof. Every real argument you make afterwards gets quietly discounted.

The rule

Drop them. The case from Isaiah 53, Daniel 9 and Yoma 39b does not need help from number games, and is weakened by standing next to them.

What to say

"I don't use the Bible-codes material. I don't think it holds up, and it isn't needed."

A Torah scroll and pointer; the letter sequence that code-hunters run their skip searches over
A Torah scroll and pointer; the letter sequence that code-hunters run their skip searches over
The half-title page of the 1851 London edition of Moby-Dick, where the same codes were found
The half-title page of the 1851 London edition of Moby-Dick, where the same codes were found
A title page of War and Peace, a control text in which sceptics found equivalent codes
A title page of War and Peace, a control text in which sceptics found equivalent codes

How they answer this — at its strongest

Defenders say McKay's own rules were looser, and some letter patterns still hold up.

Defenders — Witztum's replies, and the Meru Foundation — argue that Brendan McKay's own tests used looser rules than the first study. Some letter-skip results, they say, do survive a close look.

But the point about method is granted even by statisticians who are friendly to the idea. The results shift with the choices the researcher makes. They cannot be put to a real test. And the same effects turn up in plain secular books.

No rabbi rests doctrine on codes. Classical gematria, as in the Baal HaTurim, is sermon craft and never proof — a line the tradition itself is careful to draw.

The verdict

Don't use codes: they admit the plain text is not enough, and nothing checks out.

Do not use it. Codes and gematria invert this section's whole method. The Messiah case rests on the plain sense of public texts — the same verses the Targums and the Talmud discuss.

That is how Jesus argued on the Emmaus road, 'from Moses and all the prophets' in Luke 24:27. A hidden-message argument concedes that the plain text is not enough. It also cannot be checked, which is the one thing every argument on this site is supposed to be.

Open this case in the full study tool →

Sources

Related cases

Two Messiahs in the Talmud, and one is killed