Don't argue from the 2019 Lincoln Memorial clip

Settled

The text settles it — but concede the grievance first, or nothing will be heard.

The mistake

Building your case on viral video moments — the 2019 Lincoln Memorial confrontation, or whichever clip is circulating this year.

Why it costs you

The details of those clips get fought over. They are reported and re-reported by outlets with a side.

And they get revised weeks later. Half of any room has already decided who was wrong, based on where they read about it.

And the deeper problem

It trades a durable argument for a perishable one. Deuteronomy 28 will still be there in ten years.

The clip will not, and the person in front of you probably knows details about it that you do not.

What to say

"I'm not here about a video. I want to ask about what the chapter actually says."

News cameras outside a Minneapolis courthouse in 2020, a representative image, not the 2019 confrontation

How they answer this — at its strongest

There is nothing to answer: a viral clip is not an argument about the Bible.

Not applicable. This entry marks an argument to avoid, not a claim to answer. A viral clip settles nothing about what Deuteronomy 28 says.

The verdict

Do not use this one. Clips age badly; the chapter does not.

Avoid it because it trades a durable argument for a perishable one. Viral incidents age badly. Their details get revised. And half of any audience has already assigned blame, based on where they read about it.

The whole premise here is that the Bible both sides accept is the standard. That premise is gone the moment the argument runs through a news cycle.

Every claim in this section can be tested from Scripture, from published movement teaching, and from research. None of that expires. When an incident is genuinely needed, cite it with the care used everywhere else, including the details that cut the other way. That care is what makes the citation trustworthy.

Open this case in the full study tool →